Borrowed Billions: Carney's $25B "People's Fund" and the Conflict Question His Government Refuses to Answer

Carney announced a $25 billion sovereign wealth fund today — financed by debt, with no structural details, and modelled on countries that built theirs from oil surpluses. His Brookfield ties make the conflict question impossible to ignore.

On Monday, April 27, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced the creation of the Canada Strong Fund — Canada's first national sovereign wealth fund — with an initial endowment of $25 billion. The announcement was made at a press conference in Ottawa, one day ahead of the government's spring economic update.

"This will be a Government of Canada fund, but more importantly, it will be a people's fund," Carney told reporters. "It will be your fund."

What he did not tell reporters: where the $25 billion will actually come from.

Borrowed, Not Earned

When pressed on financing, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne pointed to Canada's AAA credit rating. "Canada can borrow on the international market at some of the lowest rates that you can see," he said.

That's not a funding source. That's a credit card pitch.

The sovereign wealth funds Carney is invoking as models — Norway and Singapore — were not built by borrowing. Norway's fund, established in 1990, was seeded with government oil and gas revenue surpluses. The same surplus cash that would otherwise sit in the treasury was invested instead. Norway had no debt to fund the fund. Canada does.

Canada currently carries $1.17 trillion in federal debt. Adding $25 billion in borrowed capital to create a government investment vehicle does not generate national wealth — it transfers risk from the private sector to taxpayers, while giving politicians control over which projects get funded.

Tim Sargent, head of domestic policy at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, put it plainly: "Countries with large sovereign wealth funds are generally large oil producers — Norway, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait — that instead of having large government debt, are in the enviable position of being able to accumulate assets. This is not the case for Canada, with its large public debt." Sargent said Canada would be better served using the $25 billion to reduce its debt rather than launching a new Crown corporation to invest in government-selected projects.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre called it a "Sovereign Debt Fund" and a "Liberal slush fund that will enrich Liberal insiders at the expense of hardworking Canadians." He listed three prior Liberal investment vehicles — the Canada Infrastructure Bank, the Defence Investment Agency, and the Canada Growth Fund — as evidence the model doesn't work.

The Conflict Question

There is a detail about this announcement that the Liberal government would prefer you not dwell on.

The Canada Strong Fund will, in Carney's own words, "invest in domestic major projects alongside private sector investors." It will operate as a Crown corporation, potentially growing to global investments. The government will consult with "stakeholders and financial industries" in coming months.

Mark Carney spent five years at Brookfield Asset Management — one of the world's largest alternative asset management firms, overseeing more than US$1 trillion in assets. Brookfield's core business is investing in exactly the kind of large-scale infrastructure and "major projects" this fund is designed to back. Carney was Brookfield's chairman. He continues to hold deferred shares and options linked to Brookfield's performance.

Four days before this announcement, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics released a report with 20 recommendations to strengthen the Conflict of Interest Act — many crafted directly around Carney's situation. The committee called on the government to require any prime minister to sell all controlled assets within 60 days of taking office, arguing that a blind trust does not constitute true divestment when the PM's policy decisions can affect the very firms those assets are tied to.

Carney's conflict screen already covers more than 100 corporate entities. The Clerk of the Privy Council, Michael Sabia — one of the two senior aides managing the screen — told the committee he sold his own Brookfield shares specifically to better manage Carney's screen. Carney himself has not sold his.

The Liberal members of the ethics committee rejected the report. Liberal MP Linda Lapointe called it "a very partisan report that was created to target a single person." The Liberals will use their new House majority to vote it down.

And last week, Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon announced the Liberals are seizing majority control of all parliamentary committees — including the Ethics Committee that produced this report.

The Pattern

A Prime Minister with deep financial ties to a firm that invests in major infrastructure projects has just announced a $25 billion government fund to invest in major infrastructure projects. Parliament's ethics watchdog recommended he divest those ties. His government rejected the recommendation. His government is now dismantling the watchdog committees that made it.

Details on the fund's structure — how it selects projects, who governs it, how conflicts of interest within the fund itself will be managed — will reportedly be provided in tomorrow's spring economic update. Canadians should read those details carefully.

The question is not whether the fund could theoretically generate returns. The question is who decides which projects get the money, and who benefits when they do.

← Back to The Daily Record